Jump to content
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
Sign in to follow this  
TSU88

Richmond postmortem

Recommended Posts

Olsen was on campus a month, tops, if that.  Yet, using that as an example, you are on point in that the Ambrose Brother's inability to spot talent on the high school level, recruit them to campus, and then develop those players into contributing members of the program, leads to even more questionable decisions in bringing in the lauded "players to be named later", such as Kevin Olsen, who was a multiple time loser at other programs. The fact that their investigation into this kid's past was so lacking in detail that they could not see that he had major character flaws, and had to be bounced from the program so quickly, is truly sad.

Setting the program back years is a bit extreme, as Olsen came in after a recruiting class was signed and was gone before the end of spring ball, so there was absolutely 0 lost opportunities to sign another high school kid the following February or, to sign another player to be named later at the end of the Spring Semester or the end of the following season.  No matter what, Ambrose made the decision to bring in the flawed kid and thus, he alone, as the head coach, was the person responsible.

None of this matters, as Ambrose is never going to get fired, or bought out from his contract.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You’re right-I meant FBS transfers. We need them, but the ones I mentioned (Mahalak, Tsimis, Kilgore) haven’t worked out. At this point, I’m exceedingly skeptical this coaching staff is capable of competently evaluating potential transfers. Not the staff’s fault if a kid gets injured, but wasn’t Tsimis, for example, injury prone at Rutgers? If so, why bring him in? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DocMinnegan said:

Olsen was on campus a month, tops, if that.  Yet, using that as an example, you are on point in that the Ambrose Brother's inability to spot talent on the high school level, recruit them to campus, and then develop those players into contributing members of the program, leads to even more questionable decisions in bringing in the lauded "players to be named later", such as Kevin Olsen, who was a multiple time loser at other programs. The fact that their investigation into this kid's past was so lacking in detail that they could not see that he had major character flaws, and had to be bounced from the program so quickly, is truly sad.

Setting the program back years is a bit extreme, as Olsen came in after a recruiting class was signed and was gone before the end of spring ball, so there was absolutely 0 lost opportunities to sign another high school kid the following February or, to sign another player to be named later at the end of the Spring Semester or the end of the following season.  No matter what, Ambrose made the decision to bring in the flawed kid and thus, he alone, as the head coach, was the person responsible.

None of this matters, as Ambrose is never going to get fired, or bought out from his contract.  

 

Vlad Lee. That's all I'm going to say.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, TSU88 said:

You’re right-I meant FBS transfers. We need them, but the ones I mentioned (Mahalak, Tsimis, Kilgore) haven’t worked out. At this point, I’m exceedingly skeptical this coaching staff is capable of competently evaluating potential transfers. Not the staff’s fault if a kid gets injured, but wasn’t Tsimis, for example, injury prone at Rutgers? If so, why bring him in? 

Yes, again, I mentioned Tsimis and CJ Williams as injured players. They are both grad transfers. Taking two chances on grad transfers with injury histories proved to be a mistake. We also have struggled to recruit on the offensive line

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, TSU88 said:

But Vlad Lee didn’t come. We didn’t get any W’s for being the runner up to JMU 

That's not what I meant. We took Olsen, who had more talent but was troubled. We could have had Lee.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is good to mix some transfers but you can't build your program focusing on transfers spend the time on building the players you have recruited from day one.if you gonna get transfers QB  makes since because good ones are so hard to come by on every level

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

Footer title

This content can be configured within your theme settings in your ACP. You can add any HTML including images, paragraphs and lists.

Footer title

This is an example of a list.

Footer title

This content can be configured within your theme settings in your ACP. You can add any HTML including images, paragraphs and lists.

Footer title

This content can be configured within your theme settings in your ACP. You can add any HTML including images, paragraphs and lists.

×